madamemodiste (
madamemodiste) wrote2010-08-29 09:12 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
Simplicity 8881
So I've begun the new Ren gown. I got out my Simplicity 8881 that I used 10 years ago only to find that the only piece that is cut out is the over skirt.
? o_O ?
I'm wracking my brain trying to figure out how that is possible. I made the dress. I'm looking at it right now. How is only the overskirt cut out of the pattern? I was just learning to sew then. Did the girl helping me loan me her pattern, and later I bought my own? There are no tracing marks on the pattern, so I didn't trace it. I have no memory of it! And here I thought I'd be one step ahead because I thought the pattern was already cut out! LOL!
One trick that girl taught me was instead of inserting boning, cut a sheet of plastic canvas to the shape of the front of your bodice and flatline it to your interlining to get that stiff, conical shape that was popular. I think something more period correct would be to use buckram or serious padding, but I am trying to use stuff in the stash and am not concerned with being period correct in this instance.
OK, I'm off to cut out fabric now! Wish me luck!
[edit] Ahh! The plot thickens! There are two copies of one of the pages of directions in the pattern bag. This proves there was once another copy of this pattern! I wonder what happened to it?
? o_O ?
I'm wracking my brain trying to figure out how that is possible. I made the dress. I'm looking at it right now. How is only the overskirt cut out of the pattern? I was just learning to sew then. Did the girl helping me loan me her pattern, and later I bought my own? There are no tracing marks on the pattern, so I didn't trace it. I have no memory of it! And here I thought I'd be one step ahead because I thought the pattern was already cut out! LOL!
One trick that girl taught me was instead of inserting boning, cut a sheet of plastic canvas to the shape of the front of your bodice and flatline it to your interlining to get that stiff, conical shape that was popular. I think something more period correct would be to use buckram or serious padding, but I am trying to use stuff in the stash and am not concerned with being period correct in this instance.
OK, I'm off to cut out fabric now! Wish me luck!
[edit] Ahh! The plot thickens! There are two copies of one of the pages of directions in the pattern bag. This proves there was once another copy of this pattern! I wonder what happened to it?
no subject
no subject
The plastic canvas trick does give you the stiff shape but I think that would be very uncomfy to wear and give you no support.
Hmm The dress itself is a bit of a mismash of styles but for what it is trying to be, I think a pair of bodies would be worn under the gown. The gown itself would have minimal boning, or perhaps just a busk to keep the front point of the bodice from curling up.
Actually now it is going to bother me until I figure what it is trying to be. Bah. Off to stare at paintings for a bit!
no subject
But after searching for info on the internet on this pattern for the last week, I see there is little info on this pattern. No one out there has yet (that I could find) critiqued/reviewed it for period correctness. It would be great if you could do that! I know one day I'd like to make a better quality gown and could use your expertise!
no subject
I think I recall a few reviews of the gown, or dress diaries but that was some time ago. But yes that is a good idea, I should review the pattern for period correctness. =D I am away from all my sewing stuff at the moment, but I know I have that pattern stashed away somewhere.
And just because my brain will not let it go,
Era wise it looks like a loose mash up these two styles
http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/MaryFitton.jpg
and
http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/HelenaSnakeborg.jpg
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Or if you use just hooks and eyes the large coat sized ones should hold together well. I have yet to make that style of gown, but I used them on a doublet without too many gapping issues.
Few other paintings in the same timeframe/similar style
http://www.flickr.com/photos/60861613@N00/3931699170/sizes/o/in/photostream/
http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/Elizabeth124.jpg
http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/Elizabeth1.jpg
Hard to tell on this one but might be front opening bodice
http://www.elizabethan-portraits.com/Elizabeth20.jpg
no subject
no subject
no subject
example, cus i can't figure out the correct wording:
H E
E H
H E
E H
etc.
I've done a number of costumes that way. and it was period to have hook and eyes. I have that documented somewhere.
Plus, some of the shapes of period trimming will hide those if ya want.
Kat, if you have any questions.. lemme know. I'm home taking the day off of all my craziness.
no subject
So I figure I'll do a piece of boning at the CF of each side and put the alternating hooks and eyes underneath. Any advice on spacing? 1" apart? 1.25" apart?
no subject
no subject
no subject